Cd&,
I remember mentioning months ago that a phpbb forum was going to take ERT nowhere. I stressed that we needed custom backend asap. Then I was told that phpbb is a good open-source project and has a huge support base.
Now you are telling me to shake my head and realize that phpbb forum has to be done away with :scratch:
Btw don't fall for Web2.0, it's just yet another funky
industry buzz word. Much like AJAX, FJAX [-(
when you wanted to do a different forum, you were porposing changing what we used... Drupal I believe. Back then, we still thought that we could do the discussions using a forum format. We came tp see that is not the case. What you were proposing was to just do a forum with a different interface, but it was still a forum. Drupal , Mambo and MediaWiki all have exactly the same problem as PHPBB. They all have a narrow scope and severe design limitations. They are difficult to customize in any way that the original authors did not conceive of; and they break when you try and stretch them too far.
A round table discussson is NOT a forum. You will see that when I post the design proposals. You will also see that there is no software around that is going to do what we want, because it is different than what anybody else has done.
I also have not said the forum has to be done away with. However I do not see it ever being an importnat place for users. It will continue, I'm sure, in some form as place were Mentor continue to discuss things among themselves; which has been its primary use up to now.
As for falling for buzz words ... Web2 is simply a label being applied to a movement that encompasseas a lot of things and it is a convenint generalization, if you want we can refer to it as:
"the open source software driven shift in basic Internet usages that has given rise to collaborative information sharing across social networking platforms characterized by content syndication, democratization of content placment, and diverse services made available through web applciations to deliver services with high levels of interoperability", however "web 2" is easier to type. If you really want a buzz word try defining "the semanic web" which is what "web2" becomes when it evoles to "web3".
The fact is, that the way information is created, distributed, presented, aggregated, summarized, reviewed and used has all changed drasticaly in the lat 2 years. Those who fail to adapt will suffer the same fate as the millions of failed, dead and shattered Web site that litter the Internet.
That is why AOL is using Netscape to test new presentation formats similar to Digg; why Excite and Yahoo are scrambling to make more free content selected by the user available. It is why Amazon is experimenting with Alexadex; Google is spreading out into all kinds of web applictions; and Microsoft is trying to figure out how to keep MSN an important player in imformation delivery.
When you see the ERT2 design maybe you will understand what ERT needs to become and maybe you won't, but is is going to be unique; and round table discussions are not a forum; and they are not a cms, and they are not going to be built with a package; though pieces from many sources might be able to contribute.